Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1
M
Member
OP Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1
Is there a reason to "not" peen aluminum parts with the smae media as used on steel parts? I would like a correlation or cause/effect analysis if it should not be done.

Joined: May 1999
Posts: 199
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 199
I've never heard of this being required by anyone or any company. I can't see any reason for it.

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
I am investigating shot peening on aluminium for Airbus and I always used S110 or S230 and had no problems.

Sincerely

Dr. Chris A Rodopoulos
[email protected]

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5
I have a similar question regarding normal practise for shot peeners when parts of different material are peened. (For example aluminium then titanium)?
Is is normal practise to have a peening machine dedicated to peening materials of a particular group so as to avoid cross contamination?
Or do some people change shot loads when material group changes?
Is there any documented evidence to demonstrate either the effects of cross contamination or that it is insignificant?


Link Copied to Clipboard
Sponsored by Electronics Inc. © 2024 Electronics Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5