Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
J
John Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
J
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
I am confused by 3.3.6 and 3.3.7 requirements for peening time. Per 3.3.6, parts shall be shot peened "using the same...time...as used on the test strip." On the other hand, per 3.3.7, "parts...shall be peened to complete visual coverage." It seems to be common knowledge that aluminum alloys reach full coverage faster than steel, so these requirements appear to conflict. We have been specifying that the coverage requirement rules (i.e., peening times on aluminum parts can be lower than T1). But how will an auditor view this?

Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 341
Likes: 1
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 341
Likes: 1
John,
You are exactly right, the specification incorrectly refers to coverage based upon the Almen strip. This is why the Surface Enhancement Division of SAE revised SAE J443 regarding the Almen strip to be used only for intensity and then the committee created a separate document SAE J2277 for Shot Peening Coverage. This clearly explains the methods to be used to establish coverage on your part.
I expect that AMS-S-13165 will be revised to address this inconsistency. Contact me if you wish to participate in this project.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Sponsored by Electronics Inc. © 2024 Electronics Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5