We like the proposal for changing J443. Our studies in the past have concluded that it is practical to run to target arc heights for verification. Can I suggest that you meant to write ±.0015 (instead of ±.015) in your example?
On a side note we suggest dropping the word "Saturation" and moving forward with the term "Intensity Determination Curve. This is something we think helps clear any confusion with all the rookies who are tempted to think that intensity calculations tell you something about coverage. This new term also brings a very convenient easy to say & write acronym "IDC".
